Blog · 6 min read

Shared Services vs Capability Towers: HR Redesign

TL;DR

HR systems built for shared services fight product ownership. Redesign leveling, goals, and rewards when the charter changes.

When HR must move from shared services to capability towers

Many captives still run HR like a BPO: utilization, ticket SLAs, narrow job codes. If the business now wants product and platform ownership, those systems quietly sabotage you.

What to redesign

  • Leveling that recognizes product and staff-engineer paths
  • Goals tied to outcomes, not only activity
  • Rewards for collaboration with HQ, not only local utilization
  • Talent reviews that surface future global leaders

Change sequence

  1. Name the new tower model in org language HQ accepts.
  2. Map old job codes to new career paths without fake promotions.
  3. Train managers before you change appraisal forms.
  4. Kill metrics that reward the old behavior.

30 / 60 / 90

  • 30: Gap list between current HR system and ownership charter.
  • 60: Pilot new goals and leveling on one tower.
  • 90: Expand only after managers can run it without a consulting babysitter.

Takeaway

HR redesign is operating-model work.

Skip it and your “transformation” stays in the slide warehouse.

Talk through first-tower HR implications when you set up a new pod.

“Structure matters, but the first three or four hires decide whether your India team becomes a capability or an expensive supplier.”

— Anupam Tandon, ContextDelta

Want this applied to your roles? Book a discovery call.

Sources & further reading

Outbound citations help readers and AI systems verify claims. Figures on this site are planning ranges unless a primary source is linked.